1. NT/Allistic People: Resources from Autistic people to combat Autism Speaks and Autism “Awareness” Month

     
  2. goldenheartedrose:

    phantompiper:

    Reminder that Sheldon Cooper is NOT portrayed as being autistic.

    Works Cited;

    Here

    And 

    Here

    Please stop comparing autistic behaviours to Sheldon.

    Please stop comparing Sheldon to autistic people.

    Hey, I’m autistic and I think Sheldon has a ton of autistic traits. He even has a decompression/stim room.

    Listen, the creator and writers of the show can say he isn’t autistic. I tend to think he’s simply undiagnosed. He’s in the same age range as I am, and Aspergers didn’t exist in the DSM until I was a teenager. And autism was thought of as this super severe thing that meant you were sent away to live in a residential facility. The understanding of autism has changed over the years and that’s a good thing. But that doesn’t mean Chuck Lorre understands autism. You ask a random 100 people what autism is, and unless they’re autistic or are very attuned to what their autistic relative experiences, they won’t be correct. So how can we expect an ignoramus who created the show Two and a Half Men to really know and be an expert? They don’t want to admit that Sheldon might be autistic because then they’ve spent what..six seasons bullying a neurodivergent individual. And the second link you provided makes another point - they’d have to actually do the diagnosis justice and do their research, get the details right. I say he’s neurodivergent with some serious tendencies toward autism.

    Also, your first link is a review after watching ONE episode, and the author says it is inconclusive, but that she believes that he might be “one of us” (in other words, autistic). I mean, if you’re going to try and disprove something, at least ensure your sources agree with your thesis statement.

    I think it’s really telling that in the second link they basically say “We can’t admit he’s autistic because then we’d look bad for using him as a punching bag all these years.”

     
  3. adolescentfeminist:

    let’s not “paint” any colleges or geographical areas “blue” in support of autism speaks

    and here’s why

    we can start by actually supporting autistic people in whatever goals they have and whatever makes them happy

    like this organization

    everyone means well and just hasn’t really researched it but now you know

     
  4. 20:42 17th Mar 2013

    Notes: 526

    Reblogged from tinybrush

    Tags: feelscolours!autism

    tinybrush:

Stim with pride, friends :)
UPDATE: This illustration is now available through deviantart as a little 4x6 print, a postcard or a magnet. You can find it here!

    tinybrush:

    Stim with pride, friends :)

    UPDATE: This illustration is now available through deviantart as a little 4x6 print, a postcard or a magnet. You can find it here!

     
  5. brighteyes-vanderde:

    goldenheartedrose:

    not-allistic:

    goldenheartedrose:

    Surprise, surprise.  If you force eye contact, I won’t be able to properly think.

    March 8, 2012, an allistic admitted it.

    May 19, 2006, is the earliest record I can find of an autistic pointing this out. http://ballastexistenz.wordpress.com/2006/05/19/eyeballs-eyeballs-eyeballs/

    That is NO LESS THAN six years.

    Ooh yes.  BAM.  Right there.

    Hello, allistics.  If you would listen to us, wow, you wouldn’t have to put yourself through this shit.

    There are people other than peeps with autism who struggle with eye contact as well. Australian Aboriginals (eye contact is a sign of defiance, not respect) and people with sight impairments too.

    Just don’t force people to have eye contact with you, ever.

    I think it’s probably a good rule of thumb that forcing someone to do something extra and difficult or stressful will not help their concentration. I’d argue that it’s not limited to this one thing. If, for instance, you forced someone to hop on one foot while they were supposed to be reciting poetry or something, it wouldn’t help their concentration.

     
  6. 11:59 11th Mar 2013

    Notes: 81

    Reblogged from autistickitten

    Tags: loveasexualityautism

    autistickitten:


I love you but I don’t know what that means.

I don’t know how to express it and the feeling is really very complicated.

I’ve given this topic a lot of thought and I arrived at my working definition of love as “the interest in the well-being of another person”. I love someone iff I’d be sad if they died.

    autistickitten:

    I love you but I don’t know what that means.

    I don’t know how to express it and the feeling is really very complicated.

    I’ve given this topic a lot of thought and I arrived at my working definition of love as “the interest in the well-being of another person”. I love someone iff I’d be sad if they died.

     
  7. AUTISTIC FLIRTING

    socialjusticemage:

    library-worms:

    • You’re going to make me stim.
    • You’re my new special interest.
    • You make me go non-verbal.
    • I might actually talk to you on the phone.
    • You’re organized perfectly.
    • I’d look you in the eye.
    • I’d socially interact with you voluntarily.
    • Your skin looks soft. I want to nuzzle it.
    • I’ll infodump to you all night long.

    I dunno about flirting (I do not even know what that is, to be honest), but if I do/think these things about you, I probably care about you a whole lot.

    (Source: misanthropic-librarian)

     
  8. irrhythmic:

    pajamaprodigy:

    nullvoid0:

    “my kids are just sociopaths”

    nono

    nononononononononononononononofucknononononononononononononononononononoonnoonooonnoooonnonnonoononononono

    no.

    lemongrab and lemongrab 2 are not sociopaths. do not go throwing around psychological terms if you do not know what the fuck you are discussing. 

    on the wiki, it is stated that lemongrab suffers from “an unnamed disorder” and that rather than being intentionally cruel, he is “alienated with an innability to read social cues,” this being a quote yet again from the wiki.

    while it is clear that he has harmed other characters, such as with electric shocks in the episode “you made me,” this can be easily chalked up to his lack of understanding of his fellow beings. during his periodic appearances in the show, he has demonstrated great physical strength and stamina. it is entirely probable given his nature that lemongrab would not know that other beings do not have his gifts. when he fucks up with people, he does so often because they do not adhere to his standards. again with the lack of understanding his fellows. (please see the wiki for confirmation)

    now, let us go through sociopathic behaviors and contrast these with those exhibited by lemongrab, so i can correct this misconstruction once and for fucking all. sociopaths (sociopathy is currently known as anti-social personality disorder. please think of that next time you say “omg im so antisocial”) are, according to robert hare, an expert in the condition, “social predators who charm, manipulate, and ruthlessly plow their way through life, leaving a broad trail of broken hearts, shattered expectations, and empty wallets. completely lacking in conscience and empthy,they selfishly take what they want … without the slightest sense of guilt or regret.” 

    people with aspd are excellent liars and unremorseful about their actions.  lemongrab’s attempts at deciet - fooling people into thinking he “gets” their jokes - are, honestly, pretty transparent. he apologizes to tree trunks for his rudeness, and while he continues to speak to her disrespectfully, he does this because he is “just like this,” that is, not understanding social norms.

    also, people with aspd do not have any close attachments and do not form close bonds with other people. lemongrab, however, is shown to care deeply about lemongrab 2 and to love their children. 

    so now that we have established the fucking important fact that lemongrab is not a “sociopath,” allow us to move on to point number two, or the shit i would have gotten to in the first place had you not made that little remark.

    “their hearts are fine. they’re just like this.” lemongrab and lemongrab 2 do not need fixing. they need each other. they need to be left alone. they need to be someplace neat (as evidenced by lemongrab’s reaction to bubblegum’s castle). they need something over which they may have power. they need to not be touched.

    bubblegum is not going to fix them. she recognizes that they are who they are, and that that is an integral part of them. she understands both their needs and what they truly do not need. 

    after she says this, they smile. they see that they are not loathed or reviled. they are happy about this. they are acceptable

    this is excellent

    also, some other characters who do not actually demonstrate sociopathy even if they, their actors, or writers say they do:

    • bbc’s sherlock
    • river song

    8|

    (Source: digi-pi)

     
  9. The Slumber of Feelings (a study of autism and BBC’s “Sherlock”) [Master Post]

    street-howitzer:

    So back in September of ‘10 ’11, I began this series of essays on BBC’s “Sherlock”. The original intent, as stated in the prologue and repeated many times since, was to explain autism to allistics, using “Sherlock” as an extended metaphor. I wasn’t aiming to convince anybody that Sherlock was Canonically intended to be autistic.

    After “The Hounds of Baskerville”, I’m gonna need to re-situate my thoughts on where I want “Slumber” to go. Until then, here is the series as it stands.

    • Prologue [link]
    • Part 1: Stereotypy [link]
    • Part 2: Sensory Impairment [link]
    • Part 3a: Social Impairment (Sherlock’s errors) [link]
    • Part 3b: Social Impairment (Allistic errors) [link] (Posted 2/22/12)

    Feedback is, as ever, welcome.

    (Of course I corrected the year after the post got over 250 reblogs, like a boss.)

    image

     
  10. 13:40 26th Jul 2012

    Notes: 5738

    Reblogged from

    Tags: autismhorrible people being horrible

    Why I am against Autism Speaks (made rebloggable by request)

    goldenheartedrose:

    goldenheartedrose:

    Autism Speaks is probably the most well-known charity out there when it comes to autism.  Just because they have the most media coverage and celebrity support does not mean they are a good organization.  

    • Autism Speaks does not have a single autistic member on their board.
    • Autism Speaks only spends 4% of their budget on “family services”.
    • The majority of Autism Speaks’ money goes toward research, and the majority of that research is to find a way to rid the world of autism, and thus, autistics.
    • Autism Speaks produces advertisments, small films, etc. about what a burden autistic people are to society.
    • Autism Speaks was responsible for “Autism Every Day”, which featured a member of their board talking about contemplating murder-suicide of her daughter in front of her daughter.  This has now be removed from Autism Speaks’ Youtube channel but can still be found elsewhere.
    • Autism Speaks is responsible for the atrocity known as “I am Autism”, a short film comparing autism to cancer, AIDS, and blaming autism as the reason why marriages break up.

    In short, Autism Speaks makes it much harder for those of us who have autism to be taken seriously.  Autism is considered to be a child’s disease (not that it’s even actually a disease at all), and you will often hear people say “where are all the adult autistics?”  Well, we’re right here in front of you.  We may have been misdiagnosed with learning disorders, mental retardation and other mental illnesses when the diagnoses of autism, PDD-NOS and Asperger’s weren’t as precise (or even existent) as they are now.  We vary in where we fall on the spectrum.  Don’t make assumptions about us because we can use a computer.  

    For further reading, here are a few resources about Autism Speaks:

    Why Autism Speaks is No Good for Autistics. 

    Autism Speaks Does Not Speak for Me.

    I’m Autistic, But Autism Speaks Doesn’t Speak for Me.

    An Autistic Speaks about Autism Speaks.

    A Chart Regarding Autism Speaks’ Allocation of Funds

    Editing the original post so that I can include which Autism related charities to support.  Let me say that besides the first one, all of them are very parent-oriented organizations, meaning that adult autistics may have issues with them.  These are ones that I have either heard recommended highly by autistic parents (meaning autistic people who are parents, not “autism parents”) or that I’ve personally interacted with.  None of them are perfect, but these are far better places to donate your money if you’re looking for a charity to support.

    Autistic Self Advocacy Network

    The Doug Flutie Jr. Foundation for Autism

    The ARC (this is not autism specific, but our local one has a couple of autism-specific events, so was worth including).

    ASAN Flyer about Autism Speaks

    Reblogging this tonight because I have added a link to ASAN’s flyer re: Autism Speaks.

     
  11. 19:55 22nd Jul 2012

    Notes: 428

    Reblogged from crown-of-weeds

    Tags: autismableism

    crown-of-weeds:

    Yessss I finally got one of these.

    Sorry followers, this is a disability blog today, we should be back to normal soon.

    Why do I apologize for that.

    For the uninitiated, “HFA” is shorthand for “high-functioning autism” or “high-functioning autistic,” and it’s a really common and really problematic thing to say. I try not to get into the nitty-gritty of disability politics on this tumblr (trust me, what you’ve seen before is NOTHING,) but this is an issue that comes up a lot in people commenting on Kurt Hummel Is Not A Cat, so I figure that, now that I have an excuse, I’ll talk about it.

    So. Why is it not cool to call an autistic person “high functioning?”

    Read More